Probably. At that point you might as well just copy/paste the existing compiler though. The temperature is basically the thing that makes it seem intelligent, because it gives different responses each time, so it seems like it’s thinking. But yeah, having it just always give the most likely response would probably be better, but also probably wouldn’t play well with copyright laws when you have the exact same code as an existing compiler.
You’re still correct. The thing about LLMs is that they’re statistical models that output one of the most likely responses, from the list of most likely responses. It still has some randomness though. You can tune this, but no randomness is shit, and too much randomness sometimes generates stupid garbage. With a large enough output, you’re statistically likely, with any randomness, to generate some garbage. A compiler is sufficiently large and complex that it’s going to end up creating garbage somewhere, even if it’s trained on these compilers specifically.
I haven’t read the bill, but from the description I think you could actually get around this by building your own. They can’t sell a printer that doesn’t have this, and you can disable it, but it doesn’t say here that you can’t build your own that never had the software. In that case, I assume we’ll see kits that are totally not meant to be assembled into printers with all their parts you need, and then unrelated documentation online somewhere on how to assemble it.
Even an identical prompt to an identical model can return both good and bad results, just depending on RNG.