One thing you need to understand about chain restaurants is that they are not all micromanaged by a central corporation. They are franchises. Usually, a franchisee pays for a license and owns one or more stores in a region. They have certain standards they need to meet to fulfill their franchise requirements, but small day-to-day decisions about how to run the store are up to them. Chili’s corporate might espouse all those values they list in their talking points (though I’ve personally seen companies turn their values on a dime when they think it is hurting their bottom-line). But they probably have very limited, if any direct input on hiring/firing decisions at a single restaurant. At most, they might step in and pressure the franchise owner to reverse this decision if they think it hurts the brand image.
I’m reading the full text of the bill, and midribbon_Action is correct. It says nothing about legally validating a user’s age. It just says that an OS must offer a way to input a DOB or age during account creation, and a way to provide info to a requesting service provider about whether the current user is a minor or not based on the provided information. Nowhere does it say that the OS provider must validate the information.
This is basically the same as a web site asking you if you’re 18 or older before letting you in, except the OS will be answering for you. Ostensibly so that a parent can set up their child’s account on the device with their actual age. But realistically this doesn’t do anything you couldn’t do with parental controls that are already available in every modern OS.