

Alright I understand your perspective now and agree.


Alright I understand your perspective now and agree.


Then the big companies will just operate under multiple names to commit tax evasion like they already do and pay off the politicians to let them.


You don’t need to know how to use social media to set up the Apple parental controls that put time restrictions on certain apps.


I don’t understand how it correlates. The article isn’t saying that children of parents who use social media are more likely to be addicted to social media, it’s saying that parental controls aren’t helping stop social media addiction in children. So how does that smoker analogy make sense?


That analogy makes no sense for this situation.


Ok but how would that even work? When a company’s product/service is good, then people start recommending it to others and more and more people start using it. The only way to stop companies from growing big is to force them to stop accepting customers after a certain point.
I agree. I don’t think screen time limits are adequate.