All the things that are easily disabled? -Sounds as foolish as having a distro for changing wallpaper, fonts and color scheme.

I have no issue with using the terminal myself, but you’re expecting other people to use something that’s foreign and unneeded when it’s not even safe to do so. Copying scripts from the internet is dangerous, and even a minor typo when you know what you’re doing can bring your system down. -Which happens even to senior system admins at times.

Some people don’t want to run Linux for the same reason they don’t want a job where a slightly off measurement in a chemical factory can destroy a town.

More than you enjoy taking cheap pot shots.

What OS is forcing updates? -Not Windows. Desktop Linux users are so self-blinding that they ignore the main reason that they end up distro-hopping. (The never ending ‘your my fault you I chose the wrong distro’ excuse.)

Yeah, sounds just like a conspiracy theorist. ‘conspiracy fact!’ lol

You do realize that it’s common for Desktop Linux users to not update because it’s more prone to breakage than Windows right?

Skill issue

You should stick to conspiracy theorist forums.

You’re making a claim, and proof you’re wrong is all around you. Sorry, I don’t deal with delusional people well.

Oh, so you know how to source something and still refuse to back your claim that Linux is more secure.

I would love it if LiGNUts could use a search engine. -But nah, they’ll wait hours and lean on others for an answer they could obtain in seconds. “cite your source” -Is the internet not at your fingertips?

Obviously not, and no one with a job and life is completing that many modern games that quickly.

Compared to what? You cannot honestly argue that Linux has better security. It’s not even a priority of Torvalds and he gets angry about too much security infringing on userspace. Everyone also knows BSD is more secure by default. We’re also talking just the kernel with Linux. Add all the ‘hobby’ type garbage that comes with DEs and you’re no longer using a kernel as your propaganda. Windows has improved vastly since the 90s when people just played mild pranks and no one was banking online.

Windows has a lot more security than Linux (which lags). Every time Windows comes out with a new technology like secure boot, Linux users will scoff and down-play it until they catch up. And this happens with more than just security.

Also, Linux has way too many toolkits. If you want all the best apps; you need to add many whole toolkits which dramatically change the footprint. All new icons, dependencies, fonts, etc. Initial installs make a great first impression, and the rest is blamed on ‘your fault’, ‘pebkac’, ‘skill issue’. -Because it’s a religion.

Valve does it: It’s ok. Sony does it: Fuck Sony!

Some severe cope you have here. I only tend to play 1 or 2 games at most in any time frame. -Maybe 3-6 a year. When one of those doesn’t play on Linux, that’s a huge impact on my view of Linux. -But that’s minor compared to the games that couldn’t be completed halfway through due to frame timing issues. Also, pacing games that experienced input lag. It’s worse to be stuck with a game broken midway on a shitty limited OS than to just have it not play to begin with.

Maybe if you played games enough to experience problems instead of constantly having to fix your Linux; you’d see these things.

Skill issue

11 is fine. I don’t miss XP, 7,or 10 at all. 11 is an upgrade.

If you continue wasting your opportunity here, I’ll just block you here too. I’m not into wasting time.