• IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Democrats had all the leverage during the government shutdown and demanded nothing.

    They had the presidency and did nothing.

    But when they have no leverage they start introducing bills which they know will not pass.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Of course.

      Can’t do anything, but gotta look like you’re doing something so they can use it for fodder in the next election

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is just so some Democrats can claim “supported/worked for higher worker wages” during their next reelection campaign.

  • Tolc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Imagine begging for crumbs of your own labour from the bourgeosie imperialist democratic party

  • 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just for show and will end up going nowhere. If you think this has even a remote chance at changing the minimum wage then I have a bridge to sell you.

    We live in a time where democrats do nothing but act appalled, corporations control politics, corporations keep getting bigger, consumer prices increase year after year, healthcare premiums constantly cost more and employee benefits keep getting more expensive every year. What gives you the idea corporations are going to let politicians triple minimum wage? If that happens it will have a ripple effect where higher paying job positions will want a raise because why should someone making an entry level wage be paid the same as a job position with a lot more responsibility?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      most of them are gop that are not electable as a republican, so they become DINOS. schumer +13 other senators are likely the same, likewise with the house seats.

    • amgine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not just that but if it passed it would eat into profits. We can’t have that, think of the shareholders

      • sunbytes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Profits are already eaten up by executive bonuses and salaries.

        It’s regular salaries that eat into those, and that’s what they’re trying to protect.

  • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can’t earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn’t matter the amount the wage is, if it isn’t also tied to inflation as we’ll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn’t. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it’s not just theater.

    Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not an expert, but in that case, the company just splits into different sub-companies, no? The manufacturing arm would have a CEO paid in stocks and lower level workers still make nothing.

    • jadetoffee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      there will never be a wage cap under this current neoliberal hellscape. the entire goal of both parties is to make money for their corporate interests

      • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s where the cap needs to be. There will always be someone capable and willing to take the job without the enormous pay packet. Executive pay is the biggest scam ever created.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          No but you see if we don’t offer 2 million a year AT LEAST we won’t attract too talent!

          • immutable@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s such a wild lie that for some reason we are all supposed to take seriously.

            We all work at companies, the executives aren’t doing anything earth shattering. Most executives seem to be running the playbook of “give the customer less and charge them more to increase profits”. Wow, what innovation!

            I would love for someone to be able to point out some concrete brilliant ideas that an executive actually had that went from “vague bullshit” to execution without getting worked and reworked and reworked by a bunch of normal employees until it was actually viable.

            Steve Jobs made the iPhone, oh by himself, did he design the chips and write the software? Sure the vision is great, but for every iPhone there are a thousand CEOs that basically keep the lights on an already functioning company and raise the price. Oversee a rebrand. Go on the news and talk up their company.

            And they’d have you believe that that’s worth 300-400x what a regular employee.

            That every day they are coming in and providing more benefit than a worker does in an entire year. It’s the most obvious bullshit we’ve ever been asked to swallow

    • aaa999@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      the “the 1%” meme is really anti-class consciousness, rich workers are workers, this individual literally forgot investors exist

  • E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just do it on a per-State level. That way blue states can push their minimum wage up without having to worry about pandering to red states. There is a reason we are a federation if States.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I feel like some degree of mandatory minimum requirements established at the federal level that’s adjusted and implemented per state would be the best case scenario. Obviously minimum wage in California or Texas simply shouldn’t be the same as in Ohio or Wyoming. It really should be more reflective of cost of living of the specific location.

      But also, if you leave it completely up to the states with no mandates from the federal level, enjoy seeing $7.25/hr indefinitely in places like Texas.

  • atoro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can’t wait for this to not go anywhere and have several dems finger-wag for the next several years saying there’s nothing they can do

  • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    They can’t pass it. They don’t have majority. Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

    I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office? Because it would’ve been actual policy, and they don’t want that. This is political virtue signaling and nothing more.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

      “We can’t pass it. We don’t have supermajority.”

      They get supermajority.

      “We can’t pass it. We don’t have the presidency”

      They win presidential elections.

      “We can’t just pass it. It has to be bipartisan or it’s bad for democracy”

      They lose midterms.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office?

      bCoS wE dOn’T hAvE tHe mAjOrItY!!

      It’s the usual and convenient excuse that Dems and their neoliberal fans love to use. As if not having a majority in either houses ever stopped Republicans! If the Dems are really serious as an opposition, which they aren’t, then they have to make popular choices-- the kitchen table issues. And not only that, actually impeach and imprison Trump. I think America has to go under a fully fledged dictatorship for Americans to actually know when they see one; kinda like Brazil imprisoning Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow the election, and they are not letting up at all. Because Brazil suffered from decades of dictatorship. Americans did not indict and arrest Trump because they are still arguing whether or not he’s a fascist.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Meanwhile Trump calls himself a fascist. Lol the country is filled with brainrot. Give them their reality tv or whatever the fuck it is my fellow Americans do all day. Sounds like a completely different language when I’m around my countrymen. Nothing going on in the head.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is specifically an optics move because they can’t pass it. Make headlines about this and a few other progressive moves in the run up to November and gain votes from the “fell for it again” neolib crowd. Then “whoops, 1-3 democrat senators are just real sticks in the mud and won’t go for it so I guess we give up”. Then frustration from the base and they eventually kill whatever momentum because they prove that when it comes to action they almost always cave. Then the gop sweeps up and regresses as much as possible.

      Lieberman, sinema, manchin, now its fetterman. who will be the next “this 1-3 person group personally stops any and all progress in America for like a decade”. The ones that give those dumb neolibs ammo, because of course the party would do so much if it wasn’t for them and you just have to vote more so that the 1-3 person group can become a 3-5 person group

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because raising the minimum wage when the economy was on the verge of collapse from COVID shut downs would have been idiotic?

    • Serinus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      So according to this there is absolutely nothing the Dems can do right now that would make you happy.

      • Heyting@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        3 days ago

        Cleansing itself from corporate corruption and zionism would be a good start.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 days ago

        You seem surprised that this is how losing trust works. If people don’t trust you will keep your promises, then it doesn’t matter what you promise them.

        That being said, there are thing they can do that are not just virtue signalling.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Democrats cry minimum wage increase if they win.

          Democrats cry legalized weed if they win.

          Democrats cry codified Roe v Wade if they win.

          Democrats cry ending the border wall if they win.

          And then don’t do it when they win. And then get mad that people notice they got swindled.

          Republicans sell lies and promise torture, and they deliver that. Lies and torture.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Drop all support for Iran war, pivot fundraising mechanisms away from Israeli influence, use bully pulpits and media to keep Epstein in the news cycle, direct more national funds to local DSA candidates, rotate gerontocracy out of party leadership, etc…

        I don’t really mind them doing stuff like this too, though.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          At least Republicans are honest in his much they hate citizens at home and abroad. They don’t mask their true intentions of the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer, and enabling fascists.

          Democrats say they care until they get elected then say they need to work with the Republicans, then go hang out with them as they vote no on any bills that would inspire confirmce in the party or even system as a whole.

          And then their brainwashed fans get mad when you can notice patterns of intentional failure across every single election. Because losing elections to Republicans makes them more money. Winning elections just allows them to vaguely stop some things but never actually make meaningful change.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They could stop being Republicans in blue. But that wouldn’t allow them to have more money, so they never will.

        Let me know when they fill any campaign promises from 2016.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        First day here?

        Most people here it seems would rather be worse off so they can continue to bitch endlessly than have anything good happen.

        Probably why half tell you voting is useless too even as primaries happen and Zoran is already in office doing things they should like.

        That notwithstanding I’d like to see polling on the matter. Right or wrong I would suspect a majority would be against such a drastic increase making this a loser of an issue.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe if the Dems actually die something good in power we’d be happier.

          Edit: sarcasm hasn’t been active for months and is just for this, while .world is currently using alt accounts to slander instances and bridge communities. Curious…

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Democrats pretend to want to do the right thing when they’re not in power.

    When they’re in power, we get more than enough no votes to sink it and tonedeaf celebration of the girlboss energy of Sinema’s thumbs down.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 days ago

          Do you really think that wages are low because higher wages would make the businesses fail? Wages are low because businesses have no incentive to raise them in an employer’s market, that’s it. They make higher margins and keep the difference.

          • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Both cases are possible. Wages may be low because of surplus of working force on the market (hence no incentives to rise wages) or can be result of extremely low margins at the given industry.

            There can be tens of reasons why wages are poor, and rising minimum pay solves the issue only in some cases

            • iglou@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              Of course, there will be edge cases of industries that have not improved their margins over the years. But the fact that prices follow inflation, and wages do not, is enough information to generalise that businesses are just greedy as fuck.

        • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most of the past history of raising minimum wage/payroll taxes/employee benefits has been immediate outcry by business groups over how all business is going to go bankrupt/the sky is falling followed by change that a year later has business chugging along mostly the same as it was prior to their catastrophizing. It’s not really surprising that employees who are able to spend more, spend more.

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is one of those ask for 100 so you can negotiate down to 50 kind of things isn’t it? Or just a pretend attempt to look good when it’s obviously rejected.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    How DARE they Show voters what to Expect if PROGRESSIVES win a Majority!

    -People who will DISAPPEAR after the Midterms!

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a great move and these are bills that need to be introduced frequently by dems right now. When people say “Yeah, but what can they do”. This. This is what they can do. Introducing these messaging bills for republicans to vote again and then grand standing on how republicans won’t do anything to help the working class.

      But dems must follow through. Minimum wage is the prefect example of where they should follow through. Attach it to a budget bill and when the parliamentarian says “not allowed” tell them to F off and push it through anyways. Just as the republicans have already done several times since they took control. Or blow up the filibuster. Either is an acceptable act for when dems get power. But they must deliver.

      If dems operate like they did in Biden term 1 or Obama term 1, they’ll be sunk in 2032.

      • Tiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pretty much. I’d love to see a party actually have balls. Ever when the Dems are in the majority they just circle jerk each other.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          We are fortunately seeing some of this with the gerrymandering bills. The absolute right messaging came from AOC when asked about the Virginia redistricting “We have a bill on the table to resolve this very problem but Republicans refuse to support it. If they hate this, they can feel free to vote to stop all gerrymandering”.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            gerrymandering likely will hurt GOP more than it helps them since they already area at the limit of doing it, and starts affect thier districts.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ll believe it when I see it and maybe not even then because it’ll get struck down by the Supreme Court or something.

      Good. Things. Don’t. Happen.