alt text

The simple answers to the questions that get asked about every new technology:

Will [blank] make us all geniuses? No
Will [blank] make us all morons? No
Will [blank] destroy whole industries? Yes
Will [blank] make us more empathetic? No
Will [blank] make us less caring? No
Will teens use [blank] for sex? Yes
Were they going to have sex anyway? Yes
Will [blank] destroy music? No
Will [blank] destroy art? No
But can’t we go back to a time when- No
Will [blank] bring about world peace? No
Will [blank] cause widespread alienation by creating a world of empty experiences? We were already alienated

    • ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Often times I see people discuss art and music, and I wonder if they see creative literature as art, or if it’s forgotten.

      I mention this because AI has been devastating on the literature world.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This brought to mind a 2012 interview with Eric Wolpaw, writer of Valve games and Psychonauts:

        Interviewer: “People take for granted that writing is easy. It’s not.”

        Erik Wolpaw: “Yeah. Everybody can write. I mean, you’re a writer. But everybody thinks that they can, because everybody can to a certain extent.”

        I think of writing as a form of art, but it’s not the first thing that comes to mind when I hear the word.

    • sydd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      Man I really hope so. But the vast majority of people consume mass produced formulaic media already, I don’t see AI helping that trend.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        3 days ago

        No amount of people doing that will ever destroy art or music, the only thing that can is reducing artists living conditions enough to where they can’t make art.

        commercial incentives already ruined art if you’re worried about this ruining art.

        • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          But now Spotify and co have a financial incentive to generate as much slop as possible and to push it to their users aggressively. Why? Well cause if their users only listen to slop, they won’t have to pay any actual artists anymore. So you know it’s guaranteed to happen. This is capitalism after all.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Spotify makes more money from artists trying to promote their work than they do from people paying to stream music.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That will mean people make music for the love of the craft again, music has sucked because of commercial incentive, maybe this will revive the craft.

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have noticed a profound lack of political commentary in music nowadays. There are a few fringe artists but that is about it.

        • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          I know artists who use AI to help them design something, but then they go out and actually manifest the physical thing…be it a mural or a sculpture or a tattoo. So no, it likely won’t harm the artists who can use it to their advantage, not for a long time.

      • r1veRRR@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Isn’t that literally the last line, but for art? The average person gave very little fucks about “art” before AI, and most art happened for purely base reasons, like marketing or porn. Fancy shmancy art will continue to exist.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Art is a fundamental human drive. In fact, not even human - neanderthals also made art. The fact that we can make cool looking pictures really easily with a computer will no more destroy art than photography did.