It’s a search engine. Y’all are just looking for excuses to screech at AI.
OpenEvidence is clear that its services should be used to supplement — not replace — doctors’ judgment. “While we hope you find the Services useful to you as a healthcare professional,” its terms of service say, “they are in no way intended to serve as a diagnostic service or platform, to provide certainty with respect to a diagnosis, to recommend a particular product or therapy or to otherwise substitute for the clinical judgment of a qualified healthcare professional.”
The best part is medically focused models have absurdly high success rates compared to humans and the entire medical and research community is frothing at the bit for this shit because it’s shown such promising results.
It’s a search engine. Y’all are just looking for excuses to screech at AI.
The best part is medically focused models have absurdly high success rates compared to humans and the entire medical and research community is frothing at the bit for this shit because it’s shown such promising results.
You have to back those claims up with good sources.
edit looking at your account you obviously have brainworms about AI, ughhh.
Your attitude will age like milk as the catastrophe of AI in healthcare begins to cause more and more issues from its inherent bullshitting.