ora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialimagemessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down19
arrow-up192arrow-down1imageThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square43linkfedilink
minus-squarehakase@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoIt’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
minus-squareReptilianCleric@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoI would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.
It’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
Fair enough
I would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.
∞ ↑↑↑↑↑… ↑↑↑∞