cm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 14 days agoCapitaleftisminfosec.pubimagemessage-square163linkfedilinkarrow-up1500arrow-down188cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1412arrow-down1imageCapitaleftisminfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 14 days agomessage-square163linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMattBlackAlien@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down3·14 days agoYou can make a very good argument that it was Adam Smith, with Wealth of Nations.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·13 days agoAnd his stated goal was competitive markets forever, not absolute monarchy with more steps. People dunk on conservatives by quoting that book.
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·13 days agoIt was influential, but capitalism had essentially already come about in a limited form.
You can make a very good argument that it was Adam Smith, with Wealth of Nations.
And his stated goal was competitive markets forever, not absolute monarchy with more steps. People dunk on conservatives by quoting that book.
It was influential, but capitalism had essentially already come about in a limited form.