• ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    No the definition is technically to be partially financially supported by public funds (I.e. government or other organization)…but that wouldn’t cover tipping from private customers either so…

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      No, you’re just wrong here and there is no technically.

      You’re misunderstanding what public funds are.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        i don’t think there’s a misunderstanding dude. i think you’re talking past each other because you used hyperbole. you both seem to be making the same point in different words, like you got different educations and degrees or something normal like that

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        You you’re suggesting that money spent by private customers counts as “public funds”, you’re misunderstanding what public funds are.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          No, a private individual does not have public funds.

          Public funds are specifically a government things.

          At this point I don’t think you understand the point I made.