First off, the answer to your “most important question” is that they are statements. Plain and neutral statements of fact. Anything else you think they are reflects on you.

Second, a maths test is written in the universal language of numbers, so how well you speak English should matter very little. This is a minor point, but it bugs me, so I put it in here for completion sake.

Third, a maths test result is an objective score. Whatever reasons you have for why you got a lower score doesn’t change the fact you got a lower score.

Fourth, if you’re dyslexic, then that would justify getting a lower score. So you shouldn’t compare yourself to a neurotypical person based on your score. You’re both working to different standards.

Fifth, the moral statement was because you suggested love for a child depended on a maths test. That’s fucked up. But the fruits and the children are both things you shouldn’t compare, and that should be your take away.

Sixth, you are also arguing against an autistic interpretation. Being autistic doesn’t mean it’s bad to argue against you. Don’t use neurodivergence as a shield. You do us all a disservice.

I’m disengaging. You should do the same.