Psychologically, what do you think is happening to a lot of the people here who seem to be failing to see the issue with Torvalds’s statements, seem to be even defending it, or even seem to be further obfuscating the particular discussion as if agenda driven? Because it is understanding and addressing these perspectives, which are going to move the needle on this.
As much as AI code is systemically viral, so too, are ideas and rhetoric on its responsible, considerate, and ethical future, if it is to have one.
AI, as it stands in the form we know it now, has no responsible, considerate or ethical future. So long as there are pedophile oligarchies, any such technology can not feasible exist in an ethical manner.
Paraphrasing as the Star Trek fans say: first you get Socialism / Communism, and from there you get the matter replicators.
Psychologically, what do you think is happening to a lot of the people here who seem to be failing to see the issue with Torvalds’s statements, seem to be even defending it, or even seem to be further obfuscating the particular discussion as if agenda driven? Because it is understanding and addressing these perspectives, which are going to move the needle on this.
As much as AI code is systemically viral, so too, are ideas and rhetoric on its responsible, considerate, and ethical future, if it is to have one.
AI, as it stands in the form we know it now, has no responsible, considerate or ethical future. So long as there are pedophile oligarchies, any such technology can not feasible exist in an ethical manner.
Paraphrasing as the Star Trek fans say: first you get Socialism / Communism, and from there you get the matter replicators.