• Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    71·
    10 days ago

    Real men never would have had their infant son mutilated.

    If my parents would’ve done such a thing, they’d be history. Unless they would be IQ80 or so, then they couldn’t have known better. An explanation, not an excuse though.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        1·
        10 days ago

        Those too, of course. But it’s parents that both think that infant genitile mutilation sounds plausible. Especially when it’s only done by cults…and US-Americans. How can end up at such a decision for their oh-so-loved newborn?

        I remember a vet telling a friend that “uteroectomy drastically lowers the chance for cancer in the uterus” in their dog. Because it’s expensive. Sounds like “teenager pregnancy drastically falls after the age of 20” :-)