I know what you wrote, and my response is based on that.
You obviously think it’s OK to make fun of people for being Vegan, and think it’s OK to make fun of people for other reasons too, like being a librarian.
That clearly makes you “insensitive”.
Maybe you should consider why you think it’s OK to behave in a way, that makes you look like that?
Try to image the situation where Trump made fun of a handicapped journalist, is that who you want to be?
Of course I can, it follows logically from your opposition to my post questioning it.
It is also logically in line with the fact that you suggest “librarian” as a better example than “foreigner”.
Thinking those 2 posts make sense and are OK, but the examples I gave you consider sociopathic, shows you can’t really distinguish between what is OK and what is not.
I know what you wrote, and my response is based on that.
You obviously think it’s OK to make fun of people for being Vegan, and think it’s OK to make fun of people for other reasons too, like being a librarian.
That clearly makes you “insensitive”.
Maybe you should consider why you think it’s OK to behave in a way, that makes you look like that?
Try to image the situation where Trump made fun of a handicapped journalist, is that who you want to be?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-s-worst-offense-mocking-disabled-reporter-poll-finds-n627736
Edit: Dialed it sown a little bit.
“You obviously think it’s OK to make fun of people for being Vegan”
you can’t cite any evidence for this
Of course I can, it follows logically from your opposition to my post questioning it.
It is also logically in line with the fact that you suggest “librarian” as a better example than “foreigner”.
Thinking those 2 posts make sense and are OK, but the examples I gave you consider sociopathic, shows you can’t really distinguish between what is OK and what is not.
“it follows logically from your opposition to my post questioning it.”
no, you’re making a leap of logic.