Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

  • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
    24·
    2 days ago

    My point was it AI is a tool. You can either use it or you dont. You speak of it being ‘expliotive’ but the world would be much better if copyright didnt exist and intellectual material was simply made available to everyone.

    • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
      11·
      2 days ago

      Do you create, or just consume?

      A world without copyright would be significantly worse for the people who makes things, like writers, artists, musicians, etc.

      In the real world, with the current laws, nobody should be entitled to exploit other people’s physical or intellectual labor. If profit is exploitation, then why wouldn’t AI be?

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        12·
        2 days ago

        So you support FOSS? So does that mean you believe source code should be GPL or some other similar license?

        • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
          31·
          2 days ago

          I do support FOSS, in fact I have written FOSS code as part of my job in the non-profit space for almost a decade. I’m thankful for all of the people who write code whether it’s copyleft GPL or permissive MIT. But I still recognize that it’s their code and that they are simply granting me a license to use it under certain conditions.

          Generative AI takes those conditions and wipe their ass with them. I have a problem with that.