Altman’s remarks in his tweet drew an overwhelmingly negative reaction.

“You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

Others called him a “f***ing psychopath” and “scum.”

“Nothing says ‘you’re being replaced’ quite like a heartfelt thank you from the guy doing the replacing,” one user wrote.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    To every developer/programmer/coder/engineer/whatever that gets laid off in favour of AI soon, keep your skills up. Keep learning. The time is coming when they’ll need you back to fix it. Remember to price yourself to make up for loss of earnings in the interim and then some

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sam Altman saying that programmers are not needed anymore is all the confirmation I need to know we’ll be very much needed, maybe a lot more than before, probably sooner than expected.

    • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      While I don’t like the idea of having to clean up all the slop his crap is generating I like the future job security.

  • metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not a programmer myself, but I don’t believe for a second that LLM’s will replace programmers.

    Altman’s bullshitting on social media is just marketing. Don’t believe for a second that this guy actually speaks truth or even knows what he’s talking about.

    However, I do believe that a lot of executives are gullible enough to fall for this vibe-coding scam and kill their business. I also believe we’re going to see a tsunami of racketeers selling broken products.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Altman knows. He still has devs in his company, and he didn’t lay them all off. OpenAI is set to go bankrupt in around 1 year. He needs to keep the hype to get as much more money in, and himself generous bonuses, before it goes down.

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    And when AI inevitably collapses, programmers should join unions and negotiate for a much higher wage, as they will be in even more need to fix all the shit that gets broken. Everyone knows it’s easier to replace or rebuild, but companies can’t do that, they’ll need their code, their databases, accounts, everything - fixed. That will cost them more than they ever thought they’d save. AI will one day do the things they want, but we’re looking at decades until it can reach that point.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    AI is lame so it should be able to take all of the CEO jobs already. That would save the shareholders millions, billions even

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Same attitude as “Canada, who needs them”. You’ll come crawling back shortly. It’s up to programmers to tell these fuckers where to go when that time comes. Know your worth.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    When. Are. We. Building. The. Leisure. Society?

    There is nothing reasonable left to do, we don’t need, or want, full employment when it just means bullshit jobs.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      As soon as we convince the billionaires to stop hiding their wealth and pay their fair share of tax.

      Ie never.

    • Xylian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The moment proper social democratic parties are builded/strengthen from within and the majority vote for social democrats.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have a feeling that OpenAI won’t be long for the chop. They’re burning through capital and unlike Google or Facebook they don’t have any other revenue stream than AI. Nor did they focus and specialise on something, such as coding so even by that metric Anthropic is shitting all over them.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This will probably put me in a blacklist in job hunting but if I work as IT in a union-busting, lay-off company and some recently fucked-over employee comes up to me I am giving them all the critical passwords “by accident.”

  • b0ber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Their models can’t replace anyone, its just a fancy autocomplete. Before, we took snippets from GitHub and StackOverflow now it’s just a chat. Cool feature, but they overpromised big time.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s really not and if you believe it is you need to use it more. The threat is real - don’t underestimate it.

      • JoeMontayna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Right. It doesn’t need parity with developers, it just needs to be cheap enough to justify the replacement. Also, there are an army of developers right now trying to make it happen, building guardrails and frameworks and even new languages to enable it. If you are an “ok” developer and you don’t have a plan B, you’re going to be hurting an a few years.

      • b0ber@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’d feel more threatened if they had a model with persistent memory and realtime adaptability. But even then its not clear if it’ll replace engineers. We’re still far from that. Until then other tech might emerge like lab grown brains, quantum chips and what not

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right! GraphRAG, VectorDBs, larger context windows, MCP servers, “tools”, “skills”, and now “using the cli as a user” still havent really solved some of the inherent flaws of even the latest frontier models. SLMs and fining tuning gives me hope on addressing the learning part of machine learning. At least a little more

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    using llm to program is nuclear bomb level security disaster in making. Eventually they will have ousted anyone competent out and affter that no one will be there to fix the security flaws that llm generated code creates. I just hope the companies that get the worst of the consequences also deserve them.

    • metermatic26@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not just a security disaster, but a disaster for performance, testing, lifecycle management etc.

      I don’t think people realize just how amazingly stupid it is to outsource your core business to an LLM, unless your software company was a get rich quick scheme to begin with (which is surprisingly common btw).

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ooh also people they just ousted will have pretty good foundations for switching to cyber-crime.