The Army will now allow recruits to enlist up to age 42 and has removed a waiver requirement for those with a marijuana-related conviction.

    • treesquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Get ready for Russia-style meat-wave attacks. We’ll just throw the poor at them until they run out of ammo! It’s genius!

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’d rather snort cocaine right in front of the MEPS people and end up in prison than ever fight for this bastard.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    They’re going to have to really redo their advertising if they’re going to attract stoners. All that advertising is about how you can see the world (and then blew it up) and get free training (in skills that are utterly useless outside of the military) and become a hero (by having your legs blown off).

    All of that sounds like way too much hard work. I just want to do my 8 hours and then go home. Also virtually every civilian job pays better. It’s amazing anyone joins up.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    As unemployment continues to increase under the MAGA turds, they might receive more recruits. However, not enough to occupy and police Iran, which will require a military draft.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder if this will bring out all those big macho MAGAs, eager to fight for Dear Leader?

    Yeah. And Neil Breen will win Best Director next year.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’d have to go to military fat camp first, and then enlisted into the crutch brigade, as copied from the current Russian model.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      That should be a global policy. These old fucks can start fighting their own wars for once in history

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        And Trump will be following Russians lead.

        We lost 58,000 in Vietnam in over 10 years, and less than 5000 in Afghanistan in 20 years. Putin has lost 1.2 million in 4 years.

        Trump is going to fight a war like Putin, because he will see those deaths as a score, and the more people that sacrifice their lives for him, the more important he is in history. People talk about Hitler and Stalin because of how many people they killed, so if he wants to be remembered for all time, he has to get real dictator numbers for his war.

        BTW, when it becomes clear that he doesn’t know what he’s doing, and he is just sending American soldiers to die in an endless meat-grinder war, enlistments will end. Then he’s going to call for a draft, and literally enslave young American men to die for him.

        Running up the war dead because he thinks it makes him look more powerful is typical Trump logic.

        • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fascism is but a cult of death.

          In such a perspective everybody is educated to become a hero. In every mythology the hero is an exceptional being, but in Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death. It is not by chance that a motto of the Falangists was Viva la Muerte (in English it should be translated as “Long Live Death!”). In non-fascist societies, the lay public is told that death is unpleasant but must be faced with dignity; believers are told that it is the painful way to reach a supernatural happiness. By contrast, the Ur-Fascist hero craves heroic death, advertised as the best reward for a heroic life. The Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.

          https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/umberto-eco-ur-fascism

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s the old propaganda strategy of making war, and dying in war, GLORIOUS and ROMANTIC.

            No, it’s just stupid, ESPECIALLY this type of war. This isn’t even being done for economic opportunity, which is evil, but at least understandable from a Capitalistic perspective, but this kind of war makes no sense. There is literally no reason or advantage to it. I think it was supposed to make Trump look tough or something, but it’s only made him look stupider - even to his own followers.

            And we haven’t forgotten the Epstein Files, we’ve just added this war to the list of his atrocities to attach to his name for all history.

            • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              He’s been claiming other presidents would attack Iran when their popularity dipped for the last 15 years. Not surprising he does it as his own tanks from the Epstein shit

              • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Conservative presidents have always thought that being a war president cements your place in history. They were throwing that around quite a bit during the GW Bush administration.

    • HotDog7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have either of you ever been convicted of a Felony?

      Convicted…? No, no… Never convicted…

    • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They can still fuck with a lot of people without a draft though.

      Most U.S. enlistment contracts have a period of four years in the inactive ready reserves (IRR) after the normal four years of active duty. Not to mention the active reserves and national guard.

      That’s a lot of people leading otherwise normal, mostly civilian lives, that could get called up. Granted, that’s not the same as a straight up draft - all of those people choose to sign up in some capacity.

      But we have a lot of bodies on tap to churn through the human meat grinder before a draft.

      Isn’t that exciting and reassuring?

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That’s not how that works. Both of my little brothers were in different branches of the military, and they had to make a choice to decide if they’d re-sign after their 4 year enlistment.

        • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That is how it works, I was in the U.S. military.

          The choice your brothers were given at the end of their four years was whether or not to sign up for another four years of active duty. Their initial contract was almost certainly actually for eight years, including four years active duty and four years IRR.

          People don’t talk about the IRR because there are nearly zero requirements during that time, it’s not the same as the active reserves. No reporting in, no fitness, medical, or training standards, etc. It just means you’re among the first on the hook if ol’ uncle sam “needs” more people ASAP, and they can legally recall you to active duty without instituting a draft.

          There are exceptions for some job roles and other circumstances, but that’s how the standard enlistment works.

            • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              20 hours ago

              What the hell just happened? You admitted you had incorrect information and accepted the correction in a mature and civil manner?

              Nah, you’re supposed to dig in and argue for hours. Maybe go through my post history to inspire some ad hominem attacks. Throw in some slurs if you’re feeling feisty.

              I guess I’ll just go back to work if you’re going to help foster an environment of constructive dialogue like that.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A draft is the only method the US has of actually invading and occupying Iran. We literally don’t have enough troops to do it with a volunteer army.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Except it’s the only way of actually toppling the Iranian government. That’s why this is quickly turning into another Vietnam. Vietnam was a quagmire because we couldn’t actually invade and occupy North Vietnam without dragging the Chinese into it like in the Korean War. So we were stuck trying to fight an air war and and indirect ground campaign from within South Vietnam. It’s the same exact dynamic with Iran. We can’t practically do the thing actually required to win. So we’re just stuck in an endless meat grinder as the Iranian government proves yet again that you can’t topple a government via air strikes. And national pride won’t let us just pack up and leave. It’s Vietnam all over again. Can’t win. Can’t leave. Just stuck there until our political will finally breaks.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yeah which would make it plan A according to this administration.

          It’s also the only way they could actually win. Well other than just leaving, but they’re not going to do that.