You what is sad… they only fought slavery because they needed more consumers for the forming industry, it was corporate interests of the north. It wasn’t a selfless movement.
Now I have no knowledge of American history but are you really claiming they had an excess of farming capacity and decided the best answer was to grow their customer base by slashing their free labour??
You what is sad… they only fought slavery because they needed more consumers for the forming industry, it was corporate interests of the north. It wasn’t a selfless movement.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I’ll allow it. You don’t know he wasn’t.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Hung Juror #69. Born during the 2000 election. They call me Hung Chad.
Now I have no knowledge of American history but are you really claiming they had an excess of farming capacity and decided the best answer was to grow their customer base by slashing their free labour??
I think he meant the industry that was forming in the north, not farming industry.
A motivation as old as time. Money. Period. It’s always money. That said, blaming the north for slavery… eh…
Corporate interests were fighting slavery… because they needed more customers? WAT?