As the title.
Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?
Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn’t known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though
No? Why? The best thing with rules is to have as few rules as possible. Your proposition adds the rule but does not improve user experience. Bad rule.
Because we as a community, value this.
Is your name “a community”? I for one don’t care either way. I can always ask an OP if I want to know who created a strip I liked if a signature is missing.
That’s why this post has been made to effectively poll the community
Yes, I solely represent the entire community and we all agree on this topic.
Or, and this is even crazier, I saw the many threads where Beep was downvoted to shit and berated because of this, and I’m able to summarize that information.
But no, that can’t be right because it means you’re not the center of the universe. It must be that first one.
According to you, it is yourself who is the centre. Go figure 🙄
I’m not sure that aggregating other people’s data and then summarizing it counts as me being self-centered. But maybe I just don’t understand how that word works.
Nope, you moron. Introducing your own views as “we as community” however does.
“Only rules that make it more fun are allowed!” Ok toddler-elected-mayor, good luck with that shit.
“Who cares about fun? We are here for more arbitrary reasons to ban!” Ok, fascist-toddler-mayor, good luck with that shit.
Good one, how’d you think of such a pithy rejoinder? I’m serious, just fully baffled over here…