• BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    okay then where are all of the amazing novels, apps, movies, and productivity gains they were claiming?

    it’s more like lead, its mildly more convenient for completing a few tedious tasks but the trade-off is brain damage and profound waste and pollution

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re saying this as if no progress is being made. Shit is scary. They’re researching at an alarming pace how to eliminate thought-based work, and only a few years in they are like maybe a third or halfway there.

      • BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        nope, if you want to exchange info i will bet you any sum of money you are comfortable with that in a few years the tech you describe will not exist, dm me

    • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The people who warn about AI risk aren’t worried about GenAI - they’re worried about AGI.

      We’re raising a tiger puppy. Right now it’s small and cute, but it won’t stay that way forever.

      • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I warn about AI. I don’t care about AGI (yet) because we are far from it.

        I’m worried about (in no particular order):

        • Software companies amassing technical debt because AI-generated code gets used without proper review
        • Massive security problems in critical infrastructure, for the exact same reason
        • Cost savings being used to make the rich richer while the people who used to do the work are just fired
        • Companies forcing AI into every single product even if it doesn’t make sense, just to make their shareholders happy
        • Rapidly increasing prices of RAM, SSDs, HDDs, graphics cards and consequently pretty much all electronic devices
        • The environmental impact because companies would rather build new power plants than optimize AI for efficiency
        • A lack of education about the limitations of current implementations. People tend to feed every question they have into ChatGPT and trust the results even when they’re completely incorrect
        • The inherent privacy nightmare that comes from funneling that much data into a centralized service

        Nothing about this is small or cute.

        I would be totally fine with something that I can supervise and that can run locally on my laptop without cooking it and doubling my energy bill. Also an economy where productivity gains benefit the workers, not the CEO. If I can do the same work in half the time, let me have the rest of the day off at full pay instead of doubling my workload and firing half your staff.

        • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t think AGI is fake, conceptually. Humans are just meat-based computers. Eventually we will build something of comparable power and efficiency.

          However, LLMs don’t seem like a viable path to AGI imo.

          • BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            We disagree about genies being real (they are not) so don’t worry about expressing or defending your points further.

            • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Nobody’s saying AGI is here right now - it’s a concept, like worrying about an asteroid wiping us out before it actually shows up. Dismissing it as “fake” just ignores the trajectory we’re on with AI development. If we wait until it’s real to start thinking about risks, it might be too late.