• StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Enforcement against Linux distributions, however, is likely to be problematic. Distros like Arch, Ubuntu, Debian, and Gentoo have no centralized account infrastructure, with users downloading ISOs from mirrors worldwide, and can modify source code freely. These small distros lack legal teams or resources to implement the required API, so a more realistic outcome for non-compliant distros is a disclaimer that the software is not intended for use in California.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s what MidnightBSD did.

      California residents are not authorized to use MidnightBSD for desktop use in the state of California effective January 1, 2027. California law CA AB1043 requires a complex age verification system implemented for operating systems with no exceptions for small open source projects. At this time, we don’t have development time or a plan in place for this.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They, eh, want for every local user account to be tied to some central database?

      In general this is going out of hand, age verification is parents’ responsibility.