Edit: As @[email protected] points out below

  1. This is just a mascot and is not a new logo
  2. The blog referencing Mozilla’s statement on the mascots gender says, (he/she/they/them/it), use whatever pronoun you prefer.
  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Such wildly fake outrage.

    The real outrage should be that we care what the pronouns of any corporate mascot are.

    They aren’t real. They aren’t able to feel. Corporations are not people.

    “It” until you are open source and then we talk.

    Same goes for Ronald McDonald.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      imo even in socialist societies brands need some protection because it’s possible to have higher quality or “differently moral” products still where people can choose the cost trade-offs of the products they use which means one product shouldn’t be able to use the investment/differentiation of another product in brand (and to a point ux research as this disincentivises usability and feeling over brochureware and copying investment in non-tangibles) to pretend to be the different product

      mozilla can be legitimately pro-foss-software in its mission and not include pro-foss-everything in furtherance of that single goal

      even then though mozilla provides downloads of their kit assets

      heck even marketing - to a point - is necessary to foss software… linux probably wouldn’t have taken off without the investments of microsoft and apple in making consumer hardware both usable (relative to early computers) and marketable