The internet runs on ads.

Ad companies pay for all the “free” popular social media we use. Ad companies dictate to social media what their clients want their ads to be associated with, not associated with, and drive media of all kinds to push inflammatory and click-bait content that drives engagement and views. It’s why you indirectly can’t swear, talk about suicide, drugs, death, or violence. Sure, you technically can unless ToS prohibits it, but if companies tell their ad hosts they don’t want to be associated with someone talking about guns, the content discussing guns gets fewer ads, fewer ads = less revenue, low-revenue gets pushed to the bottom.

So lowbrow political rage bait, science denialism, and fake conspiracies drives people to interact and then gets pushed to the top because it gets ad revenue. Content that delves into critical thought and requires introspection or contemplation languishes.

Ads are destroying society because stupid and rage sells views.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Respectfully I am not willing to get into this debate. If communism worked, we’d be doing it. Unfortunately so far it seems to have incredibly weak protections against authoritarian takeover despite its overall egalitarian appeal.

    E: triggered .ml?

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If communism worked, we’d be doing it.

      Oh you sweet summer child.

      Respectfully I am not willing to get into this debate.

      And this is why you believe that. Head, meet sand.

      Props for being polite about it though.