thank the good work of the few. also obligatory fuck this danish asshat prime minister

høyre, is more of a industry and economy interest party. they are business conservative.

it’s the party that lead the yes to eu movement last two times 🤷

eh, if it pays you usually would. You would be responsible for presenting a finished artistic product, while maybe not your vision it would be within the scope I’d say.

wheras here it’s… just slapped on afterwards by an algorithm that changes, will change and neither you nor shareholders can control how it looks.

I dont think you know what you’re talking about 😅😅

B. yes games have directors. art director would be the appropriate one here. there isn’t much of a difference between film and games in artistic intent. both have artistic intent and directors of various roles intent on ensuring that.

C. no, Nvidia is quite clear that the 50-series is buildt to run a “LLM” in this case LIM, imagemodel that is approximating. it’s supposedly only doing Ai to the lighting and shaders - but I personally don’t beilive it 😅 due to the weird faces ppl got in these pictures.

also A. no game devs are not “constantly chasing photorealism” higher fidelity I’d agree with, but that has always been within the intent of making stuff look a certain way. the muted colors of skyrim for the nothern climate. Oblivions garish colours of the central fantasy life.

gears of war wanted to be “realiastic” but that meant a very spesific color pattern.

so no, I’m sorry to say most people in these comments are “gamers” and this stuff looks like shit 😅

isnt this a shareholder decision? i.e. not the artists choice? 😅

but yes, and hopefully most people will turn off this stuff for looking ugly 🤷 but probaby mostly cus they cant afford it

that… isn’t good tho. Like sure it adds “details” but I bet this is going to make lightning wacky other places.

“artistic intent” is dead

damn rly? whats the sources?

maybe tag it nsfw? 😅

milk inside milk inside milk inside?

from the source I sendt up there

“In particular, an outbreak of E-Cigarette and Vaping-Associated Lung Illness (EVALI) brought the short-term respiratory consequences of vaping into question, especially if cannabis or THC-containing products are used[4]”

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1916433 - this is the source they point to (i.e. [4])

I enjoy lotsa unhealthy foods and stuff myself, but on my path to quitting nicotine I did vape - and quit it due to concerning research. carcinogens as in cigarettes (and weed) is well understood. Vaping is not.

anyways! I’ll finish responding now 😅 so enjoy your stuff! just be careful spreading misleading numbers like that 95%, it’s blatantaly false.

allright. keep beiliving that. good luck with your lungs. maybe you’ll be lucky

no, I think you misunderstand your source.

it says that the chemicals are not yet (in 2015) known to cause any harm. the big thing with vaping chemicals (as pointed out in my sources) is that you heat it up a lot and inhale it.

therefore the way these chemicals are used in vaping is very different than in food, and present different risks. so the research into vaping is it’s own risk.

If you really think your source is “quality over quantity” then please do read it again, and look at the dates of the studies ❤️

one of mine is a so-called cumulativte study that looks over a lot of studies to find broad trends, and that one points out that it is for certain dangerous.

back in the day tobacco companies said that smoking cigarettes was not harmful. they even funded research into saying that. I’d be sceptical of companies and the narrative that they profit from.

ah yes, the 1 source against the 4 I posted…

edit: which is also over a decade old! you had to dig back to 2015 to find this.

cool dude.

edit 2: your actual source. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a8171a7e5274a2e87dbda91/McNeill-Hajek_report_authors_note_on_evidence_for_95_estimate.pdf

says that the chemicals in vaping “have not been assosiated with any serious risk”. which means they have yet to be found harmful.

most of the ways we figure out that stuff is harmful is later. and when we do stuff with chemicals. this is when they would use these “popcorn factory smells” you’re talking about. back in 2015, the ones you said we moved away from?

yet it’s also so called “95% more safe”…

possibly worse is what I wrote.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronchiolitis_obliterans?wprov=sfla1

this is one of the things these articles talk about. also referred to as “popcorn lungs”. I’d call this worse, but it being subjective and all I can’t talk for anyone else.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11580103/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41533-022-00311-w

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10228557/

there is evidence vaping is extremely harmful to your lungs. possibly moreso than smoking.

and we know that “second hand smoking” is a thing with it sooooo.

yes. there is evidence

this uh… “mid tier” did the most henious shit here wtf

Linux wouldn’t work without furries

Then go to apple or smth?

Using the terminal is actually telling the computer what to do.

Linux is community made and it will kill itself it it doesn’t reproduce.

Linix needs people to understand it, so we can maintain it.

Well yea, Linux is about learning how the computer works; wheras windows wants to hide it