devs? yeah, no.

no?

It’s technically infinite, but the set of numbers we can express (in a reasonable timeframe), while large, is finite.

if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away

You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.

If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.

Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.

Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.

I agree, large cars are generally much more lethal to pedestrians, due to their shape, not kinetic energy.

Thats not how kinetic energy works, no pedestrian is heavy enough to stop any car, small or large.

eh, you know what, fair enough!

way to shift blame

oh wow I didn’t know that!

would make sense to give more a lot incentives for EV buying if so!

fair enough

Is this downvoted because people doesnt agree with the content, or because they don’t trust the source?

a real life example? you mean like a photo of a person next to a router?

depends a lot, but yes some lights are like that.

they never specified it to be scientific or rigorous.

This could have been amazing if integrated into a district heating network.

♫ Voulez-Vous Coucher Avec Moi Ce Soir ♫

Yes, I can imagine. It’s done literally all the time, in every genre.

alternate caption:
“has feet”

this sends a clear message though. No the old “just hook them, then we have guaranteed income forever” isn’t actually working. That’s great.