

Because people don’t like to be told what to do. Why create a black market when there is already a steep and steady decline?


Because people don’t like to be told what to do. Why create a black market when there is already a steep and steady decline?
I disagree, lots of things are much cheaper and worse.
Clothes are much cheaper and far worse. Power tools are generally a lot cheaper bit also built to break.
Houses are somehow more expensive AND lower quality though.
all the more reason for the allegory


that seems, inefficient


I’m pretty happy with my samsung. No really, hear me out, if power cuts out, when it resumes, the tv auto starts on the same input.
I have it connected to a pc, and use a smart plug for turning on and off. Haven’t seen a trace of the smarts for years :D


I hear he was a pretty good speaker 🫣


the locks are quite basic though, literally pickable with a hair pin
I’m straight, but…
He did the thing!


the idea is that to get to be the one spraying, you have to know first hand how much pain you are inflicting.


One could say he did the wrong thing for the right reasons


does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?
I mean, yeah, having good control and a sane culture around it, you couldn’t reach USA’s sheer number if you tried.
oh, well, luckily its not illegal for researchers in the rest of the world to study gun violence in America.
yeah I think the real world is more complicated. Like, its not just about numbers, but also how control is implemented and even culture.
That is absolutely fucked up, but whats the relevance?
notice how in the graph on wikipedia, excluding USA, the correlation is really not that strong.
dont get me wrong, i agree with the general sentiment, but bad data weakens even the best of cases.


Google controls search results and has been caught meddling. Which negates the first two.
No it doesn’t negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.
Cry me a river.
great argument.


It helps spread false information widely
It puts a lot of control of information in a single companies hands
It hurts the underlying sources
When google provides the info directly, and the first hand sources has become completely obsolete and shut down, what would new information stem from? It’s an inherently unstable and short sighted solution.
I’m not a donut, I’m a coffee cup!