

not what most of us want
Strongly disagree.
Oh hi there person who I’ve upset by expressing my opinion who is now wanting to go back through my post history to find something to use against me! If you’re reading this, it’s because you’ve already lost the argument :)


not what most of us want
Strongly disagree.


That’s really not an issue though.


It’s pretty clear actually - all data is encrypted at rest on their servers. They specifically say so.
https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-storage/security
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/how-to-make-strong-encryption-easy-to-use/


That doesn’t mean it’s not encrypted on their servers……


Them having access to them is irrelevant if they’re encrypted. What’s the issue?


You can ship encrypted files you know……?


The cost of B2 storage is very high, what are you talking about? USD$6 per terabyte per month would be like $4k a year for me.


I switched to a DAS for my storage and use backblaze to back up all 50TB+. I couldn’t find a cost effective way to do it with a NAS.


Dynamic sites still get cached.
Cloudflare definitely is a huge single point of failure, and it is a huge problem imo - but what can we do? Their product is so widely used because of how comprehensive, good, and necessary it is.


OP wants remote streaming - that’s a no for jellyfin, especially for people who couldn’t handle the sonarr/radarr UI.


Whenever you’re browsing even a semi popular website these days there’s probably a 98% chance you’re hitting a cloudflare cached version of it. Have you been asleep the last 10 years?
Define “accessible” here. They’re encrypted ……
Being able to download an encrypted file is not the same as being able to download it and unencrypt it, which they can’t do.