They have the ability to board US boats flying US flags in (and out) of US ports for the purpose of enforcing the law. Well, local law enforcement can, and specific government organizations. Not ICE, though. They arent a government organization that was created and fully defined by congress. Making a govt organization isnt snapping fingers and pouring money into a black hole.

Even if they were an organization with the required credentials to execute local, national, and maritime law, they didnt have a reason to attack anyone. Zilch.

No, they mean an idiot supporting this behavior because ICE did it. ICE did it so its legal!

I will say ships in US ports flying US flags are subject to our laws, but nothing justifies the psychotic brutality of the brownshirts. It may have been legal behavior, but the death penalty was also legal (nationally) at one point. Its about the weight of the response. We didnt use butterknives for executions, and people shouldnt be attacked, be forced to follow contradictory commands, strung in weird positions with zip ties, kidnapped and disappeared, etc. Being brown doesnt mean you should be slammed in a concentration camp ICE holding facility.

If our fellow americans, the staunch supporters of our dementia patient pedo pres, could read they would be very upset. Your lazy life isnt hard, you must not work as much as a hard working billionaire, psh. And Ill be one myself someday if my hat is red enough! Pull yourself up by your bootstraps and work a 12th job! 4th? I cant read.

Glad the people who wouldnt vote over Palestine arent responsible for anything, even morally. Its morally right to be in favour of multiple genocides, especially ones our president threatens personally.

Some of the population is very easy to manipulate. Taking their right to vote is wrong.

Its just a big thing to contend with. “We got a lot of dumb*ss motherf*ckers around here.” - George Carlin

11% of the population isn’t allowed to join the military due to being … too dumb. They can still vote, though.

Remember, 100 IQ is the AVERAGE, half of people are under 100 IQ.

F

Im still trying to find the “more problems” with Kamala than Trump, thats all it really amounts to.

Also, liberals ≠ leftists.

And you have to spend the rest of your life knowing you supported multiple genocides. Damn.

So is the implication that they are or were percieved as equivalent evils?

I think anyone rational would see that a man who would invade the capital of the country to overturn the results of an election isn’t very trustworthy. Voting against him is a simple way to denounce and oppose a rapist who supports strongmen and other genocides.

Supporting Israel, or not publicly denouncing them, was certainly supportive of an evil country. AIPAC absolutely has too much power in this country. How does that relate to Trump also supporting the country? And, you know, idolizing Netanyahu amongst other fascist leaders and strongmen? (I believe we can easily say Netanyahu is as much a fascist as a gymnast is flexible)

Idolizing strongmen currently committing genocides in multiple countries, attempting to overthrow the government, spreading false information leading to millions of deaths because… horse dewormer was touted as a remedy is equivalent to a moderate pretend-democrat conservative with bad opinions that could be changed, and opposed, how exactly? Project 2025 was already public information prior to the election. Equating a solid plan for introducing and attempting to cement fascism in the USA to that is a little weird.

I cant quite recall the Carlin quote, forgive the extension, but its along these lines:

“Asking about the differences between the options we have right now is like being given 2 options of airline food: Shards of glass, or (airline, yuck) chicken, and asking how the chicken is cooked.”

Like I said, poor paraphrasing. The obvious point is that a man who tripled the debt in one term and supports other genocides isnt going to attempt to stop a different genocide.

No, I don’t want to angrily tell you how to vote. I just want affirmation from potentially reasonable people that they won’t attempt to equate such obviously different candidates, and such obviously different parties. Schumer and a select few dinosaurs are not the democratic or republican party, but if you consider them a negative influence on our government and democracy, I would agree with you.

Stubbing your toe intentionally sucks. Intentionally sawing off your legs sucks a little more.

I would like to see how this post inverts its intended meaning, and how there are few reasons to vote against fascism which has repeatedly publicly announced itself as opposed to voting for it. Im truly curious how there are less pro-Trump or pro-fascist ideas and complaints with substance and more Kamala and liberal based complaints. If the message is inverted, you must be quite knowledgeable. I do want to learn, despite snarkiness, as I clearly do not understand their equivalence

I dont like her like I dont like airline chicken parm. Which is definitely equivalent to broken glass. 100%

Kamalaposters means what, exactly?

Claiming both are the same, this is impressive and sad. It indicates a serious misunderstanding of history since Reagan’s tax changes amongst other policy changes. It shows people don’t remember Citizens United. It means people don’t remember the massive economic change the Ford vs Dodge decision had in the earlier 1900s.

We live in a world where it’s easier to hold on to a belief than to challenge it. The amazing breadth of information we have access to can be frightening, but it shouldn’t prevent you from researching and attempting to disprove your ideas.

Unless the recompense for the delay is a suplex.