Seriously, I’m giving you many chances and you never manage to do better.

Just go find someone else to attempt to bother, you do not amuse me anymore.

Yeah, really low quality trolling.

So you are really unable to even counter a single point?

Really, go back to learn how to troll because you are really not good at it. Come back when you’re less boring.

There’s no point, you’re loving to defend rapists and your only way to try to feel like you’re right is to spam, enjoy your delusion and the world you’ve created, and keep up the mental gymnastics to avoid the cognitive dissonance.

Are you from 4chan by any chance? Nevermind, I don’t want to know.

If you side with the other guy, then I’m innocent until proven guilty.

Moronic trolls don’t even know how to be coherent anymore, it’s really pathetic.

Yeah I don’t know why I even bothered giving you attention

Ah, you’re one of those team-rapist that consider that it’s more common for victims to lie about getting raped, than not? That it’s fun to say to the world “hey I’ve been sexually abused and treated like a worthless crap”, while knowing that it’s very unlikely that anything will ever happen to the culprit? That’s pathetic.

If people accuse me of rape, I’m going to address it. And then you can form your opinion, just like with everything else. This is not. A. Court. You have the right to have a brain on your own, even though you visibly don’t use that right.

On top of that, you didn’t even just say “accused” but “credibly accused”, which means with a relatively good level of credibility. If in a case like that, you decide to still believe that the victims are lying, I’m sorry but you are part of the group of pieces of shit that defend, support and ultimately protect rapists. You decide to say “I will ignore all evidence, and believe a rapist until the victim manages to prove the rape legally, which is in most cases impossible”.

You sound like a very nice and likeable person.

What are you even trying to say?

Are you really implying that ideals should overcome justice, even when those ideals have been proven many times to not work?

Are you really saying that rape victims are able to get believed through the legal system, and that rapists get punished?

Keep on defending rape bro.

Are you a judge or a lawyer? Or even, a newspaper?

If not, then why do you have to follow a legal safeguard?

Why are people not saying that Trump is allegedly doing bad stuff, he hasn’t been formally condemned, so innocent until proven guilty?

If it’s not about defending rapists, then why is it that people only say that when it protects rapists and the like, but not for other criminal activities?

And last but not least, saying innocent until proven guilty about a rapist, is prematurely judging that the victims are lying. So you’re deciding to trust someone, and you’re trusting the one accused of rape rather than the victims.

But thanks for proving my point.

Yeah, that’s why as soon as someone gets accused of rape, if you dare say that they’re a piece of shit you get a ton of “innocent until proven guilty”

Even on lemmy, people keep on defending rapists. When I dared to complain about the term “allegedly raped” about the son of the princess of whatever that was good friends with epstein who had fucking literal videos that he took of the rape, people started defending it by saying that he’s innocent until proven guilty. Inescapable evidence? Believing the many, many victims that reported him? No, let’s instead pretend that we are in a court of law so that we can support the rapists.

Most men are definitely not against rape. I’m not sure that most people are, in general. They might be superficially against the idea, but practically speaking they don’t want to disturb the social status quo that protects rapists by pretending that rape victims are liars.

I mean, if you have a royal family, you’re asking for this shit

Perceived complexity*

Talk about a bad faith argument comment

Abortion is still banned in most cases, just not fully illegal.

Religion and fascism go together, as the other quotes about islamophobia showed.

A rural population is fine, the quote that you conveniently truncated was about this major rural population being conservative which in other words means fascist.

If you are fine with racism, discrimination and torture of minorities as part of a “democracy” then I guess our disagreement comes from a very different definition of what democracies and fascism are.

Well did you see my list? And are there any consequences, is Poland forced to change by Europe or threatened to be kicked out? No, because no one cares. As I said, Turkiye is unable to join the EU because of things that are basically the same as Poland, but one is told that they need to improve, the other is not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Poland

Together with the figure of the “Polish Mother”, abortion restrictions are used to encourage women to have many children. This ideology reinforces the view that women’s place is in the home

From 2024, Poland also provides mandatory firearms training for pupils in primary and secondary schools

Poland is one of the most religious countries in Europe

Poland also has a significant rural population: about 40%, which is deeply conservative

According to ILGA-Europe’s 2025 report, the status of LGBTQ rights in Poland is among the worst of the European Union countries

No current protections for health services and hate crimes exist

conservative president Andrzej Duda, who previously described the LGBT movement as “a foreign ideology” and comparing it to indoctrination in the Soviet Union

Poland has not implemented the contracting or recognition of same-sex unions, although it is obliged to do so by judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

In August 2020, the Polish Episcopal Conference released a document which recommended the creation of counseling centres “to help people who want to regain their sexual health and natural sexual orientation”. It insists that the scientific consensus that conversion therapy is ineffective and potentially harmful to be “political correctness”

An Ipsos survey in October 2019 found that a majority of Polish men under 40 believe that “the LGBT movement and gender ideology” is the “biggest threat facing them in the 21st century”

According to a 2011 poll, 47% of Poles stated that “too many Muslims live in Poland”

Since the Muslim community in Poland is small (0.1% of the population) the situation has been described as “Islamophobia without Muslims”.

On public television, guests have spoken of Muslims as “uncivilized” and a threat to “European and Christian values” and have described them as “violent”: as “Jihadists”, “terrorists”, and “rapists”.

Do you want more? There’s plenty.

If Poland tried to join the EU right now it would never succeed.

The downvotes are just proving my point, for some reason people give a free pass to Poland but it’s not very different from, for example, Turkiye, even though the latter is not managing to join the EU.

“President”

I mean, Poland has been clearly fascist for a pretty long time now, openly attacking minorities, but no one gives a shit because they are part of the EU so they are fine.