I find that Python requires a fair bit of discipline to keep it readable, and I’ve seen some very unreadable code written by people. Vibe coding with Python’s dynamic nature seems like a match made in hell.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.cato
Fuck AI@lemmy.world•NVIDIA DLSS 5.0 will render "AI generated" game video
25·2 days agoBalenciaga
That’s a terrible take and its desperately trying to draw an equivalence where there isn’t one.
I’d argue that the slop code creates more drudgery with having to constantly babysit the LLM. Never mind a new blog post every week about how your “agentic workflow” from last week is all wrong and you need even more infrastructure to wrangle the LLM. It’s worse than the way the JavaScript ecosystem used to be!
Reading someone else’s code is challenging, but at least with a person you can ask them questions or debate.
I guess I’m just someone who finds reviewing someone else’s work tedious, though a necessary part of the job.
TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.cato
Fuck AI@lemmy.world•5 second AI video for 3.4 Mega Joules of energy
16·6 days agoThe answer is in the article. Generation happens in gigantic data centers.
TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.cato
Fuck AI@lemmy.world•5 second AI video for 3.4 Mega Joules of energy
271·7 days agoStonkrocket
TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.cato
Programming@programming.dev•Projects are shutting down due to Microslop's Github CoPilot making AI contributions easy and plentiful
2·15 days agoI wonder how many of these folks just don’t know about the alternatives. I’ve come across otherwise capable developers who think git and GitHub are the same thing. People come to software from all sorts of backgrounds so I can’t blame anyone for not knowing.
I also imagine that if people are aware, the activation energy of switching is too high. It’s more than just setting a new remote and pushing. You have to learn the new system, maybe migrate tickets, wrestle with CI, etc. For a hobby project it’s probably easier to shut it down and just go do something else. I also don’t blame them here. There’s more to life than open source, and its amazing people are able to contribute when they can.
TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.cato
Programming@programming.dev•We Overhauled Our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy - Another VC funded bait and switch
1·17 days agolaughs in Emacs
It is unfortunate though, since Zed did seem to have potential. But I can’t say I’m surprised given their focus on vibe coding instead if making a good editor.

Agreed! I think both linting and type checking are extremely important to Python, but it’s also an extra step that far too many people just don’t take. And honestly, I used to get tripped up sometimes with setting up Python tooling before I started using uv.
Unfortunately I also have to work with the occasional Python script that someone just slapped together, and that’s something far too easy to do in Python. It does kind of remind me of vibe coding. Initial velocity seems high, but if you’re not thinking about it, long term maintenance tanks.
That’s not to say Python is bad, and there is certainly a lot of good Python code out there too. But it’s a language that does make it easy to make a mess, which will probably be compounded by LLMs.