Why am I not surprised about your attitude towards women.

I don’t know if appropriate to mention this, but I switched to a NAS server with Emby+Soulseek. I’m using online platforms to discover new music. Otherwise I used Qobuz before and really liked it but it was a bit expensive

This stopped working for me after a while. I think they caught on to it

It’s both. Both things can be true. Gender issues are still real in 2026.

I don’t contest any of this. It doesn’t negate the main point I was making. You’re really invested in digging down

I think the men on this platform struggle with any topic relating to the other gender. Case in point: needing to frame every problem exclusively through the lens of class struggle, even if it means demeaning the strugge of women or minorities. It’s weird

You didn’t disprove anything though. The perpetrators were predominantly male. Before you start screeching Gisslaine stop and reflect

deleted by creator

Tin hat contd: in other words, by keeping the discourse in the abstract birds eye view of theory and never addressing concrete issues (such as gender inequality), the conversation can self replicate endlessly without an exit path towards actionable items.

Tin hat off

Once again, Lemmy proving that tunnel vision and framing Every.Single.Issue through class struggle exclusively betrays a fundamental sense of empathy and understanding of any other topic whatsoever

I get it. You guys are experts on leninist theory. There are other issues happening concurrently. We can work to solve class inequality without dismissing the struggle of women or those faced by minorities. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Tin hat on: I am starting to think this dismissive strategy is intentional. There feels like an undercurrent of self sabotage intended to dilute the efforts of building a movement around class consciousness by deliberately undermining others struggles. The intended goal of this self sabotage is to never have to address concrete issues. It seems that as long as we remain in the realm of the abstract, we can keep the discourse aloof and disconnected from the real effects of what si happening through action. I can’t prove this of course. The more likely reality is Lemmy is overwhelmingly men, and men in tech. Their frame of reference is… Not the greatest when it comes gender issues

Why do you think they are mutually exclusive? I hate Lemmy sometimes. So incredibly myopic and laser focused one particular perspective.

Asking people to provide case examples of something so basic is not “having a discussion”. It’s a deliberate attempt to put the onus - again- on women to defend their position. Because you can’t extend any grace to their point of view. Some self reflection is warranted

I don’t understand people who dismiss an entire gender’s lived experience. How can you be so patronizing

It can be both. Both things can exist simultaneously. They are not mutually exclusive. I hope you understand that

You control for gender by class…? Are you OK?

So just curious, what does the DINUM do exactly?

In this case it’s the entire government top-down. It’s not just a jurisdiction. They have probably weighed the cost benefits of transitioning vs throwing money at Microsoft forever