I love how the curve of the ‘b’ looks like a ‘c’ but you used it as a ‘u’ despite bisexual already having a ‘u’ which you turned into a ‘c’.

I wonder how often photos of them get accused of being AI nowadays?

There’s a different story where a pair of twin women married a pair of twin guys, all four living together, and are all dedicated to basically living mirrored lives with each other.

Each couple had a child and while the children would be cousins they are genetically siblings. A fun fact amidst what is either mental illness, closeted polyamory, or both.

💔 This hurts to read

It’s funny cause I use AI in like the opposite way, I don’t dare let it change or add code unless it’s really simple and tedious, and even then I watch it like a hawk.

How I use AI is to teach me about repos and libraries with obscure, hard to understand, or even no documentation. I do ask for help when I hit a roadblock but rather than taking the code it gives me, I dissect it. I ask what each little weird thing does and why it’s there and the AI’s explanations give me enough to look up the right things and verify it’s legit. Then I’ll write my own version with the confidence that I know what each piece means.

Actually Deepseek’s having a resurgence because of their Engram module which is truly novel.

It’s not so much that Deepseek is a flash in the pan but more like they do some cool new thing and everyone copies their work while they recede back into their research.

A lot of AI censorship that OpenAI used in the past was just something that detects a keyword and maybe sentiment analysis. Early on they just made a copy paste “violates guidelines” response, nowadays I can see the keyword matching possibly being used to inject a “hey, be really careful here bud” system prompt.

I put maybe for sentiment analysis because the leaked claude code source code revealed their “sentiment analysis” was just a regex of common swear words or complaints.

So long as he doesn’t have a rapier we should be good.