

At that point, I think: Why not just write the code yourself?
Writing the code is more fun that reviewing code, not to mention less error prone.


At that point, I think: Why not just write the code yourself?
Writing the code is more fun that reviewing code, not to mention less error prone.


I’m guessing you let the AI make the tests and everything, which wouldn’t give me much reassurance that any of the code is good. Sadly AI will jump through any hoops it can to get tests to pass if it can’t get the code working.
I think people who let AI run wild to create a whole app should write the tests themselves or at least only with line completion (jusdging by a quick look at the project files, I am guessing an AI did everything).
Could be food for thought?


If you truly enjoy free software and the right to modify, then you enjoy copy left.
MIT is how you have your work “stolen” by people who hate freedoms and want to lock everything down.
I really think everyone using copyleft licenses is the correct future. Licensing with MIT has become very popular, but I don’t think it should be.


You make it sounds like a good thing; people will wont have microslops os by default… they may pick loonix!!! (this comment is brought to you by me)
Wait im dumb miceoslip WILL HAVE AGE ASSURANCE!!! GET out everyone will you can
I agree with you, though even when I have just made a change myself, I am looking through the git diff like a crazy person.
So, still I think refactoring my own code is much more fun than telling AI to do it for me and then proceeding to review and test it for weeks (allegedly, lol).
You seem to be using it responsibly by asking it how things could be better.
I’d never copy and paste output from an AI or give it free roam to make a PR, etc myself.
I’ll probably be sitting out on this update for a while too until I gage the general reactions of people heh :)