Yeah. I work with mentally i’ll people and Everytime my boss uses this heuristic to determine the “truth” i cringe…

Classic example for guess culture vs. ask culture… Should have just asked him for some a date instead.

Oh, you’re right. The google-guy waltzes right in alongside yourself. Doesn’t bother waiting outside to listen. And to disallow him entry is rocket science mixed with slapstick idiocracy.

Lucky my do i know how to load a CustomRoms.

You re right. The depiction of google is a bit off.

The expulsion of body mass may effect spacetime in an as of yet not thoroughly enough researched phenomenon.

Deviation from the norm of course is (afaik) the main driver of evolution. The chaotic approach. Trying out gene variations and sometimes stumbling upon a advantageous evolutionary trait. Is this about right? Because of their diversity humankind was able to adapt to changing environmental conditions. Diversity is a survival trait of humankind. At least it was for a long time. I am not sure how much this is true in the modern world

Made me laugh. Such a nice take on false Attribution :D :D

Sry, but afaik there are some flaws with this hypothesis. Neurodivergence is no defined Illness but a catch-all-term for deviations from the norm. The thing with normality is, nobody really wants to be a normalo, and only very little people fit there. Everyone has his deviations. Neurodivergence refers to mental deviations from the (statistical) norm.

Whether you Like it or not, Person A with schizophrenia and Person B with depression only have in common that they both suffer from a ICD-defined Illness. That aside, theres not much in common between the two.

Calling the ability to be mentally ill, a defining trait of humanity is kind of strange. That would make normal people less human?

I very much like the framing you used here. Words are to communicate about the world and the persons in it. This shouldn’t be made unduely difficult and complicated. Individuals wishing a special treatment don’t have a right to it, people should still try to respect the (handicapped) persons, with the respect comes a willingness to accomodate their wishes (within reason like with everyone else).

An important detail though ist the differenciation between calling someTHING stupid (action or words) and calling someONE stupid.

Every person has their right to be happy and at peace, everyone needs their self esteem (and this includes people with mental handicaps). Calling them stupid is a quality about them as persons. Calling what they said stupid leaves their quality as a person intact, next time they can choose again.

Someone might inform you about a handicap to explain their behaviour, it doesn’t make the shortsighted actions any less shortsighted. But it might help to understand the reasons and limitations of said person.

Actually that ist also put into words how i feel about extreme reactions to someone mislqbeling or misgendering someone else. You can be whatever you like, if it stays reasonable i will accomodate your preferences. If you need me to make a handstand to accomodate your preferences i might choose not to.

Ah, thanks. Much better. :)

I had experiences like this one a lot. Most of the time what you get in Amazon cheap ist trash. All the good stuff isn’t much cheaper most of the time, 35€ instead of 40€ sounds legit. For me at least (worker, 2 Kids, most def. not rich) this ist not enough to buy from the devil thats kills all thats is good

A sensible approach.

Instead of “demonstrating a rich theory of mind” it should say: 'if fed accordingly Ai copies the argumentative and diplomatic patterns of the data origin"

Yeah, thanks.

Why ist everybody Here talking Like those AIs knew what they were doing? Reasoning my ass. ++ ai don’t think

Ah there’s this saying thats comes to mind… Fu** around, find out.

Interesting take. I didn’t even register the coup until you pointed it out. It might be the dawn of corporates with pointy fingers for pointing out culprits and a broad willingness to take the bait.