• 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 19th, 2023

help-circle

  • JojoWakaki@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldFacts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Was an i3 user, testing sway here and there but couldn’t make the full switch. For some reason I couldn’t find some replacement e.g. feh (minimalist image viewing and bg setting, something that works with RAW images), ranger’s backend for image preview, devour (terminal swallowing).

    Until last year when a teams chat leaked during an online course I am a TA. It wasn’t too bad of a leak but still decided to find a replacement as I knew niri had something implemented. Switched to niri after that, the block-out-from is very useful. Found swayimg as a replacement for feh, managed to get ranger preview working with sixel (foot), found a work around for window swallowing (basically use niri msg action to consume-window-into-column then set the height to 0% and back). A lot of functionality of my ‘DE’ is based on rofi-scripts, which just works so didn’t have to tweak much for functionality. Absolutely love the window switcher that was introduced last year. I did have a window switcher with rofi, which I still use but the fancy one is cool too.



  • This is patent troll right? If I am to trust wikipedia, Nokia had nothing to do with the development of HEVC.

    The HEVC format was jointly developed by more than a dozen organisations across the world. The majority of active patent contributions towards the development of the HEVC format came from five organizations: Samsung Electronics (4,249 patents), General Electric (1,127 patents),[10] M&K Holdings (907 patents), NTT (878 patents), and JVC Kenwood (628 patents).[11] Other patent holders include Fujitsu, Apple, Canon, Columbia University, KAIST, Kwangwoon University, MIT, Sungkyunkwan University, Funai, Hikvision, KBS, KT and NEC.[12]

    Also:

    When the MPEG LA terms were announced, commenters noted that a number of prominent patent holders were not part of the group. Among these were AT&T, Microsoft, Nokia, and Motorola. Speculation at the time was that these companies would form their own licensing pool to compete with or add to the MPEG LA pool

    Something doesn’t seem right.