This comment alone should qualify you to become the second non-existing mod

Stop with the lie that it’s cheap to operate it’s not true at all wind and pv already beat it and are still on a downward trend

You must hate nuclear then, it has awful synergy with renewables since you can’t turn it off and on again quickly. Just overproducing with renewables and using batteries + gas plants for the few days the wind doesn’t blow enough is much more realistic.

What are you talking about? Building new plants takes decades. Renewables are much faster to build and are even cheaper than keep running existing nuclear plants

Ein von der Firma NuScale Power zusammen mit dem Energieversorger Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS) geplantes Projekt in Idaho (siehe auch das Idaho National Laboratory) sollte Stand Anfang 2023 USD 102/MWh erreichen, wenn man die Subventionen herausrechnete.[17] Das Projekt wurde im November eingestellt, weil die ursprünglich für die Errichtung geplanten Kosten von 5,3 Milliarden Dollar auf bereits 9,3 Milliarden Dollar gestiegen waren.[18] Zum Vergleich der Stromkosten: Nach Schätzungen aus dem April 2023 erreichen Solarfreiflächenanlagen Stromgestehungskosten von USD 24 bis USD 96/MWh

zu teuer.

Nuclear isn’t a option in the short term at all, simply because you can’t build it fast enough.

It’s also too damn expensive. And please tell where in germany we get the uran and the building materials for nuclear.

Since Tom Scott is coming back soon, that’s a clear yes.

Are you sure the Bud Spencer and Terrace Hill movies haven’t been a ad campaign by big Beans?

Over 4 more hours of sleep every week could do wonders

How many remote jobs does mars offer?