Why??

  • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because legal discovery data retrieval is almost entirely automated. You are always going to end up with some irrelevant shit in there because it matched a keyword search somebody used for discovery.

    Source: I used to do this when companies I worked for got subpoenas for email data.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s hilarious. I’m guessing its a result of an auto-redacter which is set to redacts urls or something? since the original would be

      --enable-largefile
      Enable support for large files (http://www.sas.com/standards/large_
      file/x_open.20Mar96.html) if the operating system requires special compiler
      options to build programs which can access large files. This is enabled by
      default, if the operating system provides large file support.
      
      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Large files huh? “Large” like “4k videos of blackmail material” large or what are we talking here?

        Fedora just runs my large 4k videos of totally not pirated movies just fine, I’ve never had a file too large to access.

      • skarn@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I can’t see any obvious keywords there, it would be very telling to be able to determine what theye filtering on, if we had enough unredacted/redacted pairs to find out