• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    That depends on a few more factors.The fact that their home values have skyrocketed does go a long way to alleviate that.

    Yeah, what may have been a $60,000 upgrade is now $250,000, but they’re also getting another $200,000 for their home when they sell it, which makes up the difference.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t know how evenly houses go up or how much consistency there is, but going from $100K to $200K is easier than $300K to $600K.

      Housing price increases are almost certainly making the gap wider for upgrades.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        The thing is they aren’t going up evenly everywhere. A $400,000 house from a few years back in my area is now selling for $600,000, but a $100,000 house from that same time is now selling for $300,000. So the price difference between the 2 has actually stayed the same.

        The institutional investors are targeting the cheaper houses, so they’re the ones skyrocketing the most in value.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          So still a net loss for those wishing to upgrade.

          As you said in another comment:

          I’m not saying homeowners are in a worse position. Just that increasing values also hurt them.

          My parents had to move out into the country into a smaller house because their taxes got so high they couldn’t keep up after retirement when they quit getting raises.