Compared to… https://www.rev.com/transcripts/air-force-one-press-gaggle-2-16-26
I guess it’s harder when you’re working with truth instead of just stream of consciousness bullshit that’s unrelated to any reality whatsoever.
Racist and xenophobic stream of consciousness! And that’s just the first few parts I looked through.
It was a striking moment from a self-assured legislator who is normally nimble at answering impromptu questions from reporters on Capitol Hill, and conservative critics seized on the stumble online.
Literally the next line in the article. But let’s just shit on mainstream media! Surely there’s a conspiracy here and they are lying to us!!!1
Edit: or should we got with the first sentence of the following paragraph?
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez was quicker to respond to questions about other foreign policy matters
Or 2 paragraphs later, the silly lamestream media attacks the left again!
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez sounded strongest when drawing a direct contrast with Mr. Trump’s vision of the world.
Is this an incredible article? Not really. Is it crazy biased? Also not really
Readers should be able to assume that every word between quotation marks is what the speaker or writer said… The writer should, of course, omit extraneous syllables like ‘um’ and may judiciously delete false starts.
-NYT ethical guidelines
