lechekaflan@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 14 days agoLinus Torvalds to critics of AI coding in Linux: "Fork it. Or just walk away."arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square163linkfedilinkarrow-up1282arrow-down123
arrow-up1259arrow-down1external-linkLinus Torvalds to critics of AI coding in Linux: "Fork it. Or just walk away."arstechnica.comlechekaflan@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 14 days agomessage-square163linkfedilink
minus-squareMousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·14 days agoAll AI generated code should be GPL. It was trained on all of us, and its output belongs to all of us.
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·13 days agoThat would be a copyright violation. You can’t take closed-source code, make a derivative of it, and then GPL it. That’s illegal
minus-squareMousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoI mean that if it’s allowed at all legally, it should only be licensable under GPL. Or something like that, idk, I’m half sleepy right now
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·13 days agoIf the model was trained on GPL code then one could argue anything the model outputs is a derivative.
All AI generated code should be GPL. It was trained on all of us, and its output belongs to all of us.
That would be a copyright violation.
You can’t take closed-source code, make a derivative of it, and then GPL it. That’s illegal
I mean that if it’s allowed at all legally, it should only be licensable under GPL. Or something like that, idk, I’m half sleepy right now
If the model was trained on GPL code then one could argue anything the model outputs is a derivative.