Being “pro AI” in my book goes a lot further than what they are doing. Using generative “AI” for coding with human oversight and the high standard of code review they have is a far cry from wanting to cram LLM slop into everything as much as possible. I think it’s good that they are trying to find security issues like this, for example.
Many people expected and were interested in the development of ai, it was inevitable, and frequently included in science fiction.
But as per usual… humans are why we cannot have nice things. The environmental cost of ai is far too detrimental at this stage of its development, especially due to the amount of dickbrains using it for pointless crap.
Really bad people are behind it. That is really simple. People are still capable of thinking are they not?
Being “pro AI” in my book goes a lot further than what they are doing. Using generative “AI” for coding with human oversight and the high standard of code review they have is a far cry from wanting to cram LLM slop into everything as much as possible. I think it’s good that they are trying to find security issues like this, for example.
Many people expected and were interested in the development of ai, it was inevitable, and frequently included in science fiction. But as per usual… humans are why we cannot have nice things. The environmental cost of ai is far too detrimental at this stage of its development, especially due to the amount of dickbrains using it for pointless crap. Really bad people are behind it. That is really simple. People are still capable of thinking are they not?