• quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The US outlawed selling this product after that happend. That cuts your claim of marketing for CoI down.

    And comparing a public website with a secured intranet is absured. As is comparing security systems of the 90s (when we used DES) to modern security systems.

    Tell me when they cause damage or are prosecuted, until then, it’s just an as, likely exaggerated or straight up false.

    Again, it sounds like you didn’t read the article. They were hired for this security audit. It wasn’t rogue. There won’t be a prosecution of their contractor lol.

    They were just shocked at how effective it was. Most penetration tests don’t have that many critical vulnerability findings.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, they outlawed it way before, but they didn’t outlaw that of OpenAI that also claimed to hack HuggingFace.

      It’s also very convenient to outlaw a product that does not exist as advertised.

      And “they were shocked” is not a metric. Compare it to the existing state of the art in a test controlled by a party with no conflict of interest and I’ll believe it happened.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You obviously didn’t read the article. Those are entirely different things.

        Your obvious ignorance is showing.