• S4m_S3p1l@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is the Mirror’s Edge type rebellion shit I would imagine myself doing when I was a kid as a future hacker. This is fucking sick as.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    21 hours ago

    ANYTHING cloud-connected - your doorbell, your security system, even all f**king post-2006 vehicles, regardless of manufacturer - are suspect.

    And are highly likely to be actually spying on you.

    I’ve been working with computers since 1982, on the Internet since 1988, on the Web since 1992, and in the IT industry since 1997. The proportion of average people who don’t realize how much of their stuff is exposing them, and by how much, is frankly astounding. It’s almost 100% of normies who are woefully ignorant. Even IT people who have no clue is in the majority.

    And the security on this stuff that tracks you tends to be - except in rare circumstances - absolute dogshite. Sometimes it comes without any security at all, such as all devices sold having admin creds baked in, or all remote-access credentials being identical and non-user-editable.

    This is why almost all of my stuff is hardlined, I have no IoT devices at all, and the wifi for my family’s devices is physically separate from everything else.

    Don’t get me wrong, as IT for almost three decades I love all the new shinies. But I’m not blind, and I’m not stupid.

    • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Much later into the career than you but honestly in the same boat. I don’t fucking let any of that shit into my house, I don’t use any of the big tech companies software, FOSS on everything I own and I honestly have become so disillusioned with mainline consumer tech because it’s honestly mostly trash imo. The older I get the more I realize I just want a fucking laptop with a decent keyboard, decent screen and good battery life.

  • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    Here’s a (non-exhaustive) map of Flock cameras: https://deflock.org/

    We can all do our part. Be safe and hide your identity. Leave your phones at home because they can be used to track you.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 days ago

    Stealing them is felony grand theft.

    Vandalizing them is a misdemeanor (typically, check your local laws and also don’t do crimes).

    If they were all stolen, it’s an easy PR ‘woe is us, think of the children’ win for Flock.

    If there’s a bunch of social media posts that are showing chopped down flock cameras just laying on the side of the road then it has better optics from the point of view of ‘We don’t want country-wide surveillance networks’.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    250
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who’d have thought that warrant-less mass surveillance that treats every citizen like a potential criminal would eventually hit a tipping point where people began to fight back against it?

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      What’s funny is someone at flock is likely seeing this as a business opportunity. “With flock+ we will detect downed cameras and send a technician out to replace them instantly. Subscribe now!”

      Meanwhile, municipalities are less than thrilled about defending throwing money at something literally no taxpayer wants.

      This problem might solve itself really. Let the buisness majors sell the hangman their own nooses.

      • privatepirate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sadly some people do want flock cameras because they think it’s worth it to have a better chance of catching criminals even if our personal liberties get taken away. It’s the age old freedom vs safety discussion.

        • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The thing is though you could have both, at least to a degree. You could have much more transparent policing, the cameras could do processing purely locally and based on publicly accessible lists with listed reasons for why the given plates are captured, you could make it so that the only ones who do get the data are actually thr police and not thr company selling the cameras, etc.

          But that’s not in the interest of Flock, or even really the powers that be. The surveillance machine needs feeding, doesn’t matter for what cost.

          • privatepirate@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yes, I agree very much with your statement. I think our lives would be much better if our government was built like an open source project lol

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe a year or so ago, but now those same people are starting to understand the definition of criminal is flexible.

          • privatepirate@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            I agree that the more popular opinion is changing to more freedom, but most of the older millennials and above that I talk to care more about catching criminals because they are more likely to be influenced by Facebook/Nextdoor posts and the mainstream media.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s a feature, not a bug.

        The whole point of warrantless mass surveillance where you collect a person’s entire life history from birth to death is to be able to go back through that history at any point they become an inconvenient person, whether because they are protesting or are a whistleblower or anything else that endangers the existing power structures. They can and will use your history to fabricate a “reasonable” narrative to turn you into whatever type of criminal they claim you are.

        This is exactly why they’re pushing the “antifa is an organized terrorist organization” so hard.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I watched a video last night. Some guy was banned from a casino. All they had was a blurry surveillance camera photo of him.

        The AI tagged some other guy as him. Cops came and arrested him. Said the man’s ID must be fake, or he used a fake ID last time because there’s no way their high-fallutin AI could be wrong! It was >99% certain!

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s because they want to be the ones doing the surveilling. There’s loads of disgusting threads you can find online about them discussing ways to disable or hide that their devices are recording so they can surreptitiously record others while claiming they’re not. Most often filming vulnerable women.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was almost gonna say something about killing nazis, but…

      nah, not as american

      • chloroken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Killing Nazis is a Soviet thing. In the US, we hire them for important government jobs and fold them into our culture.

          • brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            This is such awful history; of course it works because it serves the US, but it does blow me away that otherwise well-meaning people continue to parrot it. You don’t have to be a “tankie” to stop spouting this nonsense.

            You’re referring to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. That was a non-aggression treaty, not an “alliance.” The soviets would be pretty foolish to make an alliance with a country whose fascist genocidal leader, hitler, made clear the inescapable need to invade the soviet union in mein kampf.

            You know who else had already made non-aggression pacts with the Nazis before that? The UK, France, Italy, Poland, Denmark, Estonia, and Latvia. You think they were “allied” with the Nazis?

            Hell the Spanish civil war was a proxy war that the soviets had to pull out of to get ready for invasion (much to the ire of western anarchists forever).

            No, man. The soviet position was pretty damned clear: they needed time to mobilize. You think they were mobilizing to deal with…what, Poland? Everyone knew what was happening between the Nazis and the soviets. They still weren’t ready, and got slaughtered.

            Dislike the Soviet Union for other reasons. There are plenty of good ones. This is nonsense.