Case was seen as major test of the first amendment and whether the US could use broad anti-terrorism statute to prosecute leftwing protesters

  • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    It sure is a problem we have to solve but in no way should that or will that involve helping America.

    In fact the best way we can help you is by expediting the consequences of your actions.

    I could give two shits if I have to eat rice and beans for a couple of years…if it means that something will actually be done about a literal pedophile/malignant narcissist/wannabe fascist president and the political party and the electorate that are supporting him.

    • Sarah Valentine (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      What a pathetic and impotent attitude. I already said it was yourselves, not us Americans, that you should be helping. For that matter, it’s not like you personally are going to do anything about it. No, that’s a job for more responsible citizens. You’re just enjoying this opportunity to laugh at a man on fire, while he’s stumbling in your direction.

      • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yeah so in that analogy, everyone told the man not to douse themselves in gasoline, and then told him to stay away from sparks, and then told him no, lighting a match is not a good idea, then watched as he lit himself on fire. And now that he’s stumbling towards us, the best move is to kill him before he reaches us.

        I like it, thank you for that.