For three years, Andrew Osborne helped his bosses promote the idea that good design could make imprisonment more humane. As a public relations specialist at DLR Group, one of the largest architecture firms in the world, he crafted campaigns for multimillion dollar projects, like the construction of a “youth campus for empowerment” in Nashville. Or the rebuild of San Quentin state prison—former home of California’s death row—into a “rehabilitation center.” It wasn’t about simply adding more windows, he argued in marketing material. Prisons could be revamped to prioritize education; jail space could be set aside to help people through mental health crises instead of booking them into the system.

“I was selling the shit out of it,” Osborne says. “I genuinely was a convert.” A 34-year-old creative type, he’d taken the job at DLR Group after earning master’s degrees in philosophy and English literature. He truly believed the design firm, which has over 30 offices and rakes in at least $500 million in annual revenue, was committed to the stated ethos of its Justice+Civic division: to pursue “healing, equity, and transformation for the individual and community” as “stewards of the built environment.”

So when he found out on February 4 that DLR Group held a current contract to turn an old private prison in Oklahoma into a new detention center used to hold the immigrants swept up in the Trump administration’s escalated, increasingly deadly ICE operations—the sense of betrayal was instant. “I think what ICE is doing is the worst thing America has probably done since the internment camps during World War II,” he tells me, comparing the agency’s use of racial profiling in arrests to the mandatory incarceration of Japanese Americans. “It’s horrific, they’re shooting people, and here I am hating that in my heart of hearts. And it turns out my company is involved in it.”

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, that definitely could be. But, better late than never? And the way the article read, it sounded to me like the person was trying to use architecture as a poison pill from the inside to do better. Not gonna solve the system, and he swears by doing right. Which does seem to address humanity, which is a good step. He could be absolutely full of bullshit, but he could also be one of those people trying to fight the good fight.

    I dunno. Maybe my standards are tanking with how things have been going.

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Look regardless of the reason… Any bit helps the cause. So I’m happy to see it.

      I do like your take on it. It seems totally plausible… Not many people want to risk their jobs so that would be one way to approach it as safely as possible.