Including “net” in net positive means that it is more positive than the negatives, so… you’re saying that starting an illegal war of choice with no real longterm plan and bombing children and civilians was worth killing the Iranian supreme leader. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it is probably not really what you meant, but it is what the words you typed meant.
For me, currently, it is more positive, yes. Killing iranian tyrant just might allow people to overthrow their current government. As for legality of your war, well as far as world is concerned might makes right. Like at best world leaders will be deeply concerned over american war.
Including “net” in net positive means that it is more positive than the negatives, so… you’re saying that starting an illegal war of choice with no real longterm plan and bombing children and civilians was worth killing the Iranian supreme leader. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it is probably not really what you meant, but it is what the words you typed meant.
For me, currently, it is more positive, yes. Killing iranian tyrant just might allow people to overthrow their current government. As for legality of your war, well as far as world is concerned might makes right. Like at best world leaders will be deeply concerned over american war.