• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    No they did not, lowering prices on oil derived fuel is counter to the values that made us introduce those taxes to begin with.
    Those issues haven’t changed, like limiting our dependency on oil, and preventing CO2.

    People need to use as little oil as possible, that still goes.

    • sicilian@lemmychan.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This isn’t about people using as little oil as possible.

      This is about domestic producers being able to maximize profit off of their product.

      • Melchior@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trucking companies only look at the numbers. A truck uses 35-50 l/100km. So 1€ higher diesel prices make a massive difference for an operator. An electric truck is like 100k€ more expensive then a diesel one. So if a truck drives 700km a day, then it takes like two years for the electric truck to make the money back the 1€ higher diesel price creates., if charging is very cheap.

        So this matters.

    • hobata@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think you forgot to mention the stupidst German thing that would solve all the transport issues - the Lastenrad.

        • hobata@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I hope if you have a family you do not drive them like this.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I bet children being driven on a bike like that have more fun than being driven in a car.
            They are more in contact with the environment, and they are more in contact with the parent, and it’s perfectly safe.
            So why exactly would you hope that? Do you really think it’s better for the children to sit with their iPad in a soft cushioned air conditioned car? Where they have to communicate with a parent talking over the shoulder?

            IDK what country you are from, but that’s an attitude I would expect mostly from ignorant Americans.
            You would probably not send your children to this kind of kindergarten where the children are outdoor almost exclusively either:
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_kindergarten

            • hobata@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s a terrible and unsafe solution to drive someone in that cab.

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                Terrible how?
                Many places it is as safe and sometimes even safer than a car, because many places here now have bicycle routes.
                I hope you don’t raise kids in a country where this isn’t safe.
                The bike is fine, it’s probably you or your country that is the problem.

                • hobata@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Because its size and weight make it harder to balance and maneuver. In city traffic, drivers often misjudge its turning radius or stopping distance. If it tips or hits uneven pavement, a child seated in front is exposed with minimal protection compared to a car. Poor visibility and lack of safety features like airbags or enclosed space add to the risk.

                  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    None of those issues are serious in reality, they follow roads and bicycle paths fine, and they are driven relatively slowly, so break distance is not a problem. If there were real safety issues I guarantee you it would be regulated here.


                    We’ve had special bikes like these since 1929 without problems, but the one shown above were only for goods, not for children. And is very rarely seen since the 70’s. But we are used to that kind of bigger bikes in traffic.

                    Regarding poor visibility that’s just a sign you are grasping at straws, nothing has better visibility than a bike. Visibility is far worse in a car, and a car drives faster. A bike has no blind spots, it has no windshield that can be dirty, and you sit higher on a bike and can see more than in most cars. You don’t need an airbag when you are doing 10-15 km/h.