If we can’t be bothered to vote in the primaries, wjy would anyone believe us that a progressive candidate would somehow lure millions more to vote?
As I know the comments will be, uhhh, fun, I’ve turned off reply notifications.
If we can’t be bothered to vote in the primaries, wjy would anyone believe us that a progressive candidate would somehow lure millions more to vote?
As I know the comments will be, uhhh, fun, I’ve turned off reply notifications.
Is all the polling rigged too, from every major pollster, including notably progressive-leaning ones?
The general electorate, including even the narrower subset of the Dem electorate, is just not as progressive as most of us. Even Mamdani barely managed a majority in NYC, which is hardly as conservative as, say, suburbs in Pennsylvania.
Horseshit.
Data for Progress released survey results late last month showing that 65% of likely US voters—including 78% of Democrats, 71% of Independents, and 49% of Republicans—either strongly or somewhat support “creating a national health insurance program, sometimes called ‘Medicare for All,’ that would cover all Americans and replace most private health insurance plans.”
Elected democrats consistently vote against massively popular propositions.
As your own source notes, this is a very recent development
10+ years at minimum, is not “very recent”. A majority supported single payer healthcare before 2016.
In February [2016], a Harvard University survey discovered that a majority of 18-to-29-year-olds, did not support capitalism, and preferred socialism instead.
Are you fucking kidding me? Did you not read the fucking source linked?
Oh, wow, the demographic least likely to vote. Great. Clearly this will swing the vote.
Ironic.
If you had read the source I linked, you would see that it contradicts your point.