• FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    This might be illegal, but it is NOT a method of effecting needed change. I’m not promoting Arson at all over organizing unions and promoting progressive reform, but if you’re going to burn something down at least target their financials and personal properties.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        NO THEY DIDN’T THEY BURNT DOWN A WAREHOUSE FULL OF SUPPLIES WHICH BELONGED TO THE COMPANY. MICHAEL HSU IS GETTING PAID THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT AFTER THIS.

        Not the third party staffing agency, not a bank, not his office, not his cars, none of that. A giant pile of diapers that people needed, that’s what.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Kimberly-Clark is a publicly traded company, owned primarily by various billionaires. Economic harm to the company is economic harm to the owners of that company.

          This worker did do something to the billionaires. He attacked the source of their wealth.

          Those diapers didn’t belong to the people. Those diapers belonged to the billionaires. You’re still not understanding that those were billionaire diapers.

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Those diapers belong to nobody, now. We all have less access to diapers. I named so many examples and yet here you are refusing any course of action that minimizes harm done to common people. You don’t seem to care about billionaires you just want the people of the USA to hurt themselves.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              There was no harm done to common people. Diapers are not a finite resource. The factories that produce them are still running. They just got new orders to fill. Diaper-factory workers just got new work.

              Demolition crews just got new work. Construction crews just got new work. The workers in the factory just got unemployment benefits: paid time off of work, until they find new work. Firefighters just got overtime pay. Other warehouses in the region just got new work. Everyone except the billionaires and their insurers are benefitting from this.

              Your argument only makes sense if the contents of that warehouse belonged to the people. If we were in a communist society, you’d have a point. But we aren’t.

              • FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                If you claim you don’t see how rising diaper costs hurts normal people I think you’re just coping hard.

                • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  They aren’t rising. There is no shortage. The benefits to normal people far outweigh even your imagined harm.

                  He burned down a warehouse, not a factory.