FaceDeer

I find it amusing that he stuck another 10% on. Does he think he’s “punishing” the Supreme Court somehow by doing that? Complete pudding-brain going on here.

Are you aware that there’s more to the court system than juries? And that those juries, too, operate under a strict set of rules about what they can and can’t rule on?

If you’re not investing anything in anything then this really isn’t your problem.

The companies that continue with human staff where others are replacing theirs, for example. Outsourcers providing those staff.

Whereas I prefer an organized rules-based justice system over anarchy and vigilantism. Because who knows when you or I might end up being in the “disliked” category?

But don’t you see? We don’t like these particular people, so they should suffer the maximum possible penalties under every circumstance.

If we liked them then punishing them for wearing glasses would of course be a travesty.

Depends entirely on the circumstances of where it does end up being built. I’m not sure what “gotcha” you think you’re making here? That Reddit comment is just me pointing out that when a business uses electricity they pay for it.

So it’ll be built somewhere else. Data moves around quite easily.

Where’s this infinite well of investment money coming from? “Economic magic” is pretty vague.

Then invest in competitors, they’ve got a more flexible timeframe.

So what’s the problem? This looks self-correcting to me, if none of the AI companies are profitable then they’re going to go away. Short their stock and make a fortune.

It’s been darkly amusing watching the various social media hive-minds that used to be all for the concept of “information wanting to be free” suddenly discovering that they hate AI more than they love freedom of information.