• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    What bugs me is that is really shouldn’t be legal for tech companies to just unilaterally decide that the local residents are going to subsidize their power costs.

    But we’re in America, where every single douchy thing a capitalist can do will absolutely be done, and both of our ruling parties will just shrug and keep collecting their bribes in the interim.

    Good on the people for waking up to this and fighting back.

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s more that local authorities are offering incentives to big tech to bring in those data centers, ostensibly because they think it will benefit the area, but more likely because it is benefitting the local authorities personally through kickbacks or campaign donations.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “It’s time to build communities, not data centers,” said one local activist.

    A wonderful motto.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not exactly. Princeton NJ and the surrounding areas are quite wealthy. The wealthy/elites have decided they don’t want their places polluted or to subsidize the costs of these data centers. It certainly wasn’t Newark and Camden that fought and won this.

    • red_green_black@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah how dare communities not allow AI Slop Mines that steal all the water and power not be in their community.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s some very important transatlantic cables that come ashore in New Jersey; data centres built there will have excellent links to both the Eastern US and a lot of Europe, making it quite a desirable location.

      Data centres have a few constraints on their locations. Network connections, of course, and power and water for cooling. Their margins are also a bit dubious (Ed Zitron did an excellent investigation in a recent article) but they benefit from low taxes and sweetheart deals with the local municipalities. Doesn’t take much to make that deal look shaky and be rid of the DC. Well done though NJ, keep it up!

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      And that’s bad for the harm it will cause to people who are bound to be in a poorer locale, right Facedeer?

      Right?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Depends entirely on the circumstances of where it does end up being built. I’m not sure what “gotcha” you think you’re making here? That Reddit comment is just me pointing out that when a business uses electricity they pay for it.

  • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sacramento (the state-side of it) is entertaining plans going in the opposite direction of New Jersey. A recent deal wants to let Meta in here on the promise: they’ll build some affordable housing, they’ll refurbish some old state buildings (for Meta use), and something for the local college. The reaction here is {bear looking sideways meme}.

    Bets on where the surprise ai data center will be?

    https://www.gov.ca.gov/2026/01/29/governor-newsom-sacramento-state-and-meta-advance-major-redevelopment-in-downtown-sacramento-to-create-affordable-housing-for-students/